Posts: 423
Threads: 18
Joined: May 2010
Tom on the VEDA Forum Wrote:Is it correct that CAP_NEW discounts from the
middle of a period to it's start year if no NCAP_ILED is defined for a
technology? In the global model, where periods have 10 years duration, this
discounting factor increases the reported lump sum investment (LUMPINV) costs
significantly compared to the calculation based on pure investment costs and
new capacity (NCAP_COST x VAR_NCAP), in particular when NCAP_DRATE is high
(e.g. as I assume for residential solar PV).
No, there is no discounting from the middle of a period to its start
year. To get the lump-sum investment cost, all the annual investment payments
are just discounted to the beginning of the commissioning year k associated to each payment stream. When neither
NCAP_ILED nor NCAP_DRATE is defined, the LUMPINV value should thus be equal to
NCAP_COST × VAR_NCAP. But if either of them is defined, the lump sum cost
will be higher, because with interest during construction or a higher required
rate of return, the present value of the investment payments at the
commissioning year will be higher than NCAP_COST × VAR_NCAP.
Posts: 4
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2019
Hello,
if the NCAP_ILED is larger than lengh of periods, the LUMPINV is shown in the period in that the construction starts (e.g. one period before the period of commissioning year). Is that correct, please?
Even in that case, LUMPINV= all the annual investment payments are just discounted to the beginning of the commissioning year k associated to each payment stream, right?
Thank you.
Lukas
Posts: 423
Threads: 18
Joined: May 2010
31-03-2025, 08:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 31-03-2025, 08:49 PM by Antti-L.)
> LUMPINV is shown in the period in that the construction starts (e.g. one period before the period of commissioning year)
No. LUMPINV and INSTCAP are reported for the commissioning period. The vintage index is also reported, and so you should see the vintage being different from the period in such a case.
> all the annual investment payments are just discounted to the beginning of the commissioning year k associated to each payment stream, right
Yes. In effect, this means that in the case where no ILED and no NCAP_DISC is specified, LUMPINV divided by the installed capacity will be equal to the average NCAP_COST defined for the years k of each stream (and if NCAP_COST is constant, then you would even get LUMPINV = NCAP_COST × VAR_NCAP).