22-12-2021, 01:11 PM
(21-12-2021, 10:09 PM)AKanudia Wrote: Q1: why do you have the "-0" in year2 in the first half of the table?
Q2: what are you trying to achieve in the year=year2=2012 section?
A1: I am not familiar with the MIG table (my first thought was to use UPD table) and so most probably my table is wrong. I wanted to extrapolate the change I made for 2040 onwards by the end of model time horizon.
A2: I just wanted that the model keeps the assumptions as they are for the first model years up to 2040.
//Akram
