IEA-ETSAP Forum › Model Generators › TIMES v
Non-binding constriant

Thread Modes
Non-binding constriant
AkramS Offline
Junior Member
Registered
Posts: 27
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2019
#5
13-02-2019, 05:56 PM
I want to define minimum district heat penetration in the residential sector for the heat demand.

The way that I thought was correct (very simple) and tried to include in the UC-table:

"Heat supply by disrict heating" + "Heat supply by individual boilers" = "Heat demand in the residential sector"
"Heat supply by district heating" >= 30% of "Heat demand in the residential sector"

Thanks for your help!
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 13-02-2019, 04:27 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by Antti-L - 13-02-2019, 05:06 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 13-02-2019, 05:35 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by Antti-L - 13-02-2019, 05:45 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 13-02-2019, 05:56 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by Antti-L - 13-02-2019, 06:53 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 13-02-2019, 07:11 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by Antti-L - 13-02-2019, 07:27 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 13-02-2019, 08:36 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by Antti-L - 13-02-2019, 08:57 PM
RE: Non-binding constriant - by AkramS - 14-02-2019, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)