> With OBLONG=YES, this correction block is skipped entirely (coef_alt.lin jumps past it to $LABEL DONE/$LABEL UPDATE at lines 80 and 148), and the divisors are left at their uncorrected, uniform ("oblong") values.
I think you are misreading the code. Those lines after 80 are executed when using the alternative objective formulations ALT or LIN without OBLONG (basically meant for the experimental LIN option). With the standard OBJ=AUTO, OBJ=STD or OBJ=MOD without OBLONG, they are not executed at all.
I just tested myself using OBLONG=YES, I am myself seeing LUMPINV (lump-sum investment cost) being reported exactly according to NCAP_COST (if not using NCAP_ILED), and so I cannot confirm your findings. Therefore, a reproducible test case demonstrating the issue would really be helpful.
I think you are misreading the code. Those lines after 80 are executed when using the alternative objective formulations ALT or LIN without OBLONG (basically meant for the experimental LIN option). With the standard OBJ=AUTO, OBJ=STD or OBJ=MOD without OBLONG, they are not executed at all.
I just tested myself using OBLONG=YES, I am myself seeing LUMPINV (lump-sum investment cost) being reported exactly according to NCAP_COST (if not using NCAP_ILED), and so I cannot confirm your findings. Therefore, a reproducible test case demonstrating the issue would really be helpful.